Elaborative interrogation is a strategy for improving long-term memory and comprehension by connecting new information with prior knowledge.
It is based on asking questions so that students explain why a fact or concept is true, makes sense, or how it relates to other information. In this type of elaborative question, students must generate reasoned answers.
This technique promotes a deep conceptual understanding of what has been studied, improves long-term retention, and facilitates the transfer of knowledge to new situations beyond the classroom.
If you want to learn more about what elaborative interrogation is, keep reading.
What is elaborative interrogation?
Elaborative interrogation is an instructional strategy that asks students questions when they are learning new knowledge so that they can make connections between the new information and their prior knowledge of the subject.
With this type of active learning, teachers make learning more meaningful and memorable, which reinforces long-term memory.
This happens because when students ask themselves “why?” about certain facts or statements and come up with answers that require the mobilization of prior knowledge, this process connects the new information with schemas that already exist in their memory.
Why it works: a deeper definition of elaborative interrogation
Elaborative interrogation works because it involves students generating their own explanations in response to facts presented through questions such as “Why is this true?”
The main mechanism of action is to integrate new information with students’ prior knowledge.
But the positive effect at the cognitive level goes much further. The new information is organized and associated with already established concepts, making it easier to retrieve. This improvement in the availability of knowledge is particularly useful in higher-order cognitive tasks, such as the transformation and synthesis of ideas from multiple sources.
In this strategy, elaborative questions take on special relevance. We address them in the next section.
What are elaborative questions?
Elaborative questions are questions asked to students about an explicit fact to generate reasoning or justification.
To elicit this response, general questions about the cause of a fact can be included, as well as more guided formulations related to the content or integration of various sources.
Here are some examples of this type of question:
- “Why does this happen?”
- “What do you know about this topic?”
- “How do these topics relate to what you have read in other sources?”
- “What would happen if…?”
In any case, students are challenged to connect new information with their own knowledge or to relate various pieces of information to each other. In short, they are asked to construct meaning.
Elaborative interrogation vs. self-explanation
The main difference between elaborative interrogation and self-explanation is that in the former, the student is expected to explain a specific fact. However, the self-explanation process is broader because the student responds by using personal examples, analogies, or rephrasing to clarify concepts.
While it is true that both strategies require the student to respond and elaborate on a message, self-explanation involves a greater amount of elaboration.
Examples of elaborative interrogation in action
Let’s look at everything we’ve discussed so far with an example. During a class, the teacher may invite students to reflect on what they know about the topic to be covered. This allows the teacher to verify the starting point and direct the class to capture their attention.
Once the topic has been addressed, students can be asked what new topics they think emerge from the information studied, for example.
In this case, the questions you can ask may focus on:
- The truth of a fact or concept: “Why is this true?”
- Justification through comparison: “Why could this formula be applied in this case and not in that case?”
- Meaning: “Why does it make sense that this happened this way?”
Keep in mind that elaborative questioning involves not only knowing, but also discerning and establishing relationships. Let’s look at some more examples.
In the classroom
The text to be worked on in this example is: “Polar bears have white fur.”
The elaborative question could be: “Why do polar bears have white fur instead of brown or another color?”
To be effective, the elaborative answer must address issues such as camouflage in the snow, evolutionary adaptation, survival in the Arctic, etc.
In professional training
Elaborative questioning also offers benefits in the context of professional training.
For example, suppose we are in a pediatric training course and the concept to be worked on is “Honey should not be given to children under 2 years of age.”
The elaborative question would be: “Why can honey be dangerous for children under 2 years of age?”
The answer should address the possible presence of Clostridium botulinum bacteria spores. The child’s intestinal flora is not mature and cannot effectively compete with the spores, which can germinate, multiply, and release botulinum toxin into the intestine.
Is the basic functioning of elaborative questioning becoming clearer?
In personal study
It can also be very useful in personal study, because it gets students used to deepening their learning through questions they ask themselves.
For example, in French, the past participle agrees with the direct object when it comes before the verb: “Les fraises que j’ai mangées.”
The question the student can ask themselves is: “Why does this agreement rule exist when the direct object precedes the verb?”
To answer, the student must refer to the Latin origin of the language, the clarification of the grammatical relationship, the auditory distinction in certain cases when the following word begins with a vowel in “mangé/mangées,” etc.
The trick is to learn to enjoy stimulating curiosity while consolidating concepts.
Do you want to stay on top of the latest trends in eLearning, EdTech, and Human Resources?
Fill out the form to receive our weekly newsletter with industry insights from our experts.
Who benefits most from using elaborative interrogation?
Studies such as Woloshyn, Wood, Willoughby, and Pressley (1990) Elaborative Interrogation Facilitates Adult Learning of Factual Paragraphs have found that elaborative interrogation improves factual memory.
Why? Because it activates deeper cognitive processes than those used in passive memorization. This fact implies a series of benefits for the learning process, which we will discuss in detail below.
Connect new information with prior knowledge
Instead of memorizing a fact, such as “water freezes at 32 °F,” the question is asked: “Why does water freeze at 32 °F?” This forces the person answering to search for explanations based on what they already know.
This helps them create additional semantic connections in their memory because they need to retrieve knowledge about physics.
In addition, the person improves the encoding of the information, generates various routes to retrieve it when needed, and strengthens the network of meanings surrounding that piece of information.
Promotes deep processing of information
Elaborative questioning forces the brain to elaborate, analyze, and generate explanations.
This deep processing increases the likelihood of remembering something in the long term, as reported by Craik & Lockhart (1972) in their research Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research.
At the same time, the person who is reasoning establishes conceptual relationships that drive the development of their critical thinking.
Consolidates long-term memory
Various studies, such as the one conducted by Woloshyn, Pressley & Schneider (1992) entitled Elaborative interrogation and prior-knowledge effects on learning facts, and published in the Journal of Educational Psychology, have validated elaborative interrogation as an effective strategy for consolidating long-term memory.
This strategy promotes the integration of new knowledge into existing networks, which facilitates not only its retention but also its subsequent retrieval. Long-term memory thus becomes working memory more efficiently.
Promotes more characteristic coding patterns
The answer to an elaborative question extracts the fact being asked about from its isolation. In other words, the memorized fact becomes part of a narrative or logical explanation, thus acquiring more meaning.
This process reduces confusion between data that may appear similar, because each has its own “universe of meaning.” Similarly, this improvement in the discrimination between concepts favors the specific retrieval of information.
In this vein, it promotes interdisciplinary connections, as students relate one topic to another, which in turn helps them mature emotionally.
Activates mechanisms similar to the testing effect
The cognitive effort involved in active recall improves the accessibility of information for evaluative environments. This is because the exercise of responding to an elaborative interrogation reproduces the mechanisms that are activated in evaluative tests.
We can rightly assume that working on memory in this way reduces anxiety and stress levels in exams, as it improves the accessibility of data and increases students’ confidence in their own knowledge.
How to integrate elaborative interrogation into learning?
One of the most effective ways to integrate elaborative interrogation into learning is by relying on the Rosenshine Principles of Instruction.
This technique was created by Barak Rosenshine, professor emeritus at the University of Illinois, widely known for his studies on the development of cognitive supports in the classroom.
In the following sections, we describe the steps you can follow.
Activate prior knowledge
Try to start each lesson by reviewing what was learned previously. This will allow you to build solid connections with the new information.
Introduce questions such as: “How do you think this topic relates to what we studied last week?”
Avoid cognitive overload
Divide the content into short blocks and ask an elaborate question for each one to consolidate learning.
Questions such as “How does this fact relate to that one?” can be useful.
Ask the right questions and provide immediate feedback
Your questions should encourage students to explain, connect, and justify, and they should receive immediate feedback to reinforce the information in their memory.
You can deepen students’ reasoning with questions such as: “What makes you think that?”, “What would happen if it were the other way around?”, “Why do you think that’s true?”
Be careful, this is not about sowing doubt in the student and making them lose control of their knowledge, it is about helping them find different ways to explain their answer or detect gaps that you can fill with the right information.
Provide models of elaborate reasoning and take on the role of guide
Especially at the beginning, your students will need you to model the elaborate reasoning process and show them how to proceed.
One of the best ways to do this is to take on the role of a student who has to answer an elaborate question about a fact. Explain aloud how you would try to explain why that fact occurs and relate it to what has already been covered in class.
As a supplement, you can provide templates with a series of questions such as: “What are the implications of this fact?”, “Why has it led to this other fact?”, etc.
It is essential that you accompany your students both in formulating quality questions and in generating useful answers. Working in pairs can be very effective in these cases.
Pay attention to your students’ answers
Answers are valuable indicators of the class’s level of understanding. Pay attention to detect conceptual errors, misunderstandings, or gaps in knowledge.
Superficial answers or those that do not show a connection with prior knowledge are not valid in this educational strategy.
Use instructional scaffolding
Instructional scaffolding allows you to provide a structured framework that supports your students at the beginning to build a solid relationship of trust, and gradually work on their autonomy and self-regulation.
Practice is the key to a successful process. Start with lots of support and resources, such as models and prompts, until the student gains autonomy.
Promote the cumulative effect in students
A very useful way to promote the practice of this method is to incorporate elaborative interrogation into autonomous learning. You can introduce questions in assignments, essays, forums, or presentations. This will also allow you to reinforce their use on a regular basis, rephrase questions, and improve old answers.
As you can see, elaborative interrogation allows you to improve your students’ performance, get to know them better, and adapt your strategies to their progress, but it can also become a really useful resource for students’ autonomous learning.
Limitations and considerations for effective implementation
By now, you have discovered that elaborative interrogation can be a really effective technique for stimulating and improving your students’ learning.
However, it is equally important to recognize its limitations:
- It does not adapt equally well to all types of content. As we have mentioned, it works well with specific facts and concepts, especially in causal relationships, but with other types of data, such as complex procedures, it may be less effective.
- Educators must learn to ask questions. Finding the right balance between questions that are too vague or complex (which can confuse students) and questions that are too simple (which do not stimulate deep thinking) can be counterproductive. For this reason, one of the biggest challenges of this method is that educators will need to develop specific skills to know how to ask questions that are appropriate for the level of knowledge and needs of their students.
- Students may be reluctant. Remember that elaborate questioning is an active learning technique, and some students, accustomed to a passive role, may find it difficult or unmotivating to participate. This is another factor that must be worked on gradually in class so that students can adapt to the process.
Common mistakes and how to avoid them
One of the main mistakes often made when implementing this technique in the classroom is that students do not have prior knowledge of a topic. In this case, they may feel limited and find it difficult to come up with good explanations if they do not have concepts or facts to refer to.
Another mistake is not considering the importance of the quality of the answers. Various studies highlight the positive effect of elaborative questioning when students have been trained to generate quality explanations, not just to answer correctly.
It is really important not to confuse this type of strategy with multiple-choice questions or closed quizzes. As we have seen, a specific question is asked about a specific fact, but a detailed answer is expected. You should work on this with your students.
And finally, keep in mind that factors such as the quality of the questions, the feedback you provide, and the time you give each student to respond will influence the outcome.
Keep in mind that elaborative interrogation is a way to introduce a culture of “why” in both educational and business settings, fostering curiosity as a competitive advantage.
Since it helps consolidate knowledge, connect learning, and encourage critical thinking, it will help you improve the performance of your training strategies.
And for this strategy to be truly effective in assessment contexts, especially remotely, it is crucial that those answering the questions do so authentically and without external help. In this regard, having reliable online proctoring systems will allow you to ensure the validity of the tests and the integrity of the answers generated.
At Smowltech, we offer our clients scalable, ethical, and fair online monitoring systems through our proctoring plans that help you protect the educational value of your strategies.
We invite you to request a free demo so you can see for yourself the innovative solutions we can provide for your institution or company.
Resources for further learning
Below, we would like to share a series of resources that we think you may find useful in continuing to discover how elaborative interrogation can help you:
- In this article, Virginia Clinton, Assistant Professor of Educational Foundations and Research at the University of North Dakota, asks, What if Students Can’t Produce Useful Elaborations? In it, she explains that the effectiveness of the method lies in the students’ ability to produce useful explanations.
- The study Elaborative interrogation examined at encoding and retrieval (Willoughby & Wood, 1994) examines how elaborative interrogation facilitates learning by improving the organization of concepts and the retrieval of material.
- Researchers Kühl and Bertrams conclude in their publication Is Learning With Elaborative Interrogation Less Desirable When Learners Are Depleted? that elaborative interrogation can be beneficial, but only when students are not cognitively overloaded. Under conditions of ego depletion, the technique is less effective.
