Higher-order thinking skills transform students from passive knowledge receivers into active architects of understanding through critical analysis, problem-solving, and creative synthesis.
As artificial intelligence takes on routine cognitive tasks, the human capacity for critical analysis, creative problem-solving, and value judgment has never been more necessary.
However, higher-order skills are a concept that continues to be misunderstood, so we felt it necessary to prepare a document to explain what they are, with practical examples that will allow you to understand their meaning and implications in the classroom.
What are higher-order thinking skills?
Higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) are skills that require people to actively manipulate data to generate new meanings, solve poorly structured problems, or create original solutions.
The aim is for students to become active architects of their own learning and understanding process, focusing their actions on analyzing, evaluating, and creating.
These skills are of great importance in American education, especially when we consider the common state standards for higher education preparation, which require the development of analytical reasoning rather than mere passive memorization of content.
HOTS are also relevant in the business sector, as employers increasingly value workers who are capable of designing innovative solutions and making sound decisions, especially in situations of uncertainty.
Higher-order thinking skills vs. lower order thinking skills
Understanding the difference between higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) and lower-order thinking skills (LOTS) is necessary to design comprehensive and disruptive teaching.
To make a clear distinction, we can say that LOTS retrieve and understand information, while HOTS manipulate and transform it.
In other words, LOTS recognize correct answers, and HOTS construct original answers. We will explore this in more depth through Bloom’s taxonomy in the next section.
Higher-order thinking skills in Bloom’s taxonomy
Higher order skills correspond to the top three levels of Benjamin Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives.
This classification of human cognition was developed in 1956, although the framework has evolved since its introduction.
For example, Anderson and Krathwohl’s 2001 revision of the taxonomy modified the original hierarchy of static nouns (knowledge, comprehension, etc.) and turned them into dynamic verbs (remember, understand, etc.), placing the action of “creating” at the pinnacle of cognitive achievement.
Bloom’s six levels were conceived as states of knowledge, ranging from simple to complex in a hierarchical relationship.
In Anderson & Krathwohl’s update, the structure remains the same, but the researchers reinforce its practical use, adapting it to the needs of current teaching and assessment.
Thus, Bloom’s taxonomy would be as follows:
| Aspect | Bloom Original (1956) | Anderson & Krathwohl (revised in 2001) |
| Level 1 | Knowledge | Remember |
| Level 2 | Comprehension | Understand |
| Level 3 | Application | Apply |
| Level 4 | Analysis | Analyze |
| Level 5 | Synthesis | Evaluate |
| Level 6 | Evaluation | Create |
Bloom’s taxonomy vs. Anderson and Krathwohl review: key differences
Anderson and Krathwohl introduce the need for classification to also be measurable in assessments, tasks, and rubrics, connecting what is known with how it is used.
Likewise, these authors introduce a two-dimensional matrix that crosses the cognitive processes of the six proposed verbs with types of knowledge (factual, conceptual, procedural, metacognitive), which makes it easier to describe more precisely what is learned and how one thinks.
You can see the most significant differences they make in the following table:
| Bloom vs. Anderson & Krathwohl | |||
| Dimension of knowledge | Not specified | 4 types: factual, conceptual, procedural, metacognitive | Allows for more precise objectives to be designed by combining cognitive levels with the type of knowledge |
| Format of categories | Nouns | Verbs | Emphasizes action and facilitates measurement of objectives |
| Structure | Linear/hierarchical | Two-dimensional (processes + knowledge) | More flexible structure that is better suited to instructional design and authentic assessment |
| Educational use | Conceptual, general | Practical, applicable to objectives, tasks, and rubrics | Allows for assessment of what students know, but also how they use that knowledge |
Now that you know how cognitive skills are classified, take a look at which levels lower-order thinking skills and higher-order thinking skills fit into and what primary functions they perform:
| Cognitive level | Order | Primary function |
| Remember | LOTS | Recover essential facts, terms, and concepts from memory |
| Understand | LOTS | Explain ideas, interpret meanings, and summarize information |
| Apply | LOTS | Use knowledge and procedures in familiar situations |
| Analyze | HOTS | Break down information to identify underlying patterns, relationships, and structures |
| Evaluate | HOTS | Evaluate evidence and arguments according to established criteria in order to make informed judgments |
| Create | HOTS | Generate original solutions, products, or ideas based on existing knowledge |
Do you want to stay on top of the latest trends in eLearning, EdTech, and Human Resources?
Fill out the form to receive our weekly newsletter with industry insights from our experts.
The four pillars of advanced cognition
Bloom’s taxonomy represents the fundamental architecture of advanced thinking.
However, the most recent research has identified four essential and interdependent cognitive skills: critical thinking, problem solving, creative thinking, and decision making.
These cross-cutting skills are also among the most sought after in the business ecosystem.
Critical thinking
Critical thinking analyzes and evaluates information assets through observation, experience, or communication.
This skill is increasingly relevant, as it allows us to identify logical fallacies, recognize biases, and evaluate the quality of sources and materials.
Its relevance in information societies takes on greater importance when we understand that it involves cognitive work that forms the basis of democratic citizenship, but also of scientific research.
Problem-solving
Problem-solving is strategic when faced with poorly structured challenges, i.e., problems that do not seem to have clear solutions or that may have multiple valid approaches.
These types of approaches are more realistic and present dynamics that will be recurrent in the real world, both personally and professionally, where iterative cycles are necessary to define problems, generate hypotheses, test solutions, and evaluate results.
Creative thinking
Creative thinking involves divergent thinking, capable of generating original and useful ideas and products in specific contexts.
Creativity is a strategic skill in all fields, both in scientific and humanities-related environments.
For example, it is just as necessary for a researcher to be able to imagine new molecular structures as it is for a historian to propose new interpretations of archives.
Decision-making
Decision-making allows you to choose between alternatives and weigh different considerations such as ethical, emotional, social, cultural, or political factors.
In many fields, people who are capable of making informed decisions occupy effective leadership roles.
These types of people are strategic in positions of responsibility where they have to weigh multiple factors in a fair and balanced manner, especially in times of uncertainty.
Examples of higher-level thinking skills
Higher-level thinking skills (HOTS) can become tools for transforming routine classroom tasks into challenges.
This will allow you to work with your students on in-depth analysis, critical evaluation, and innovative creation, with practices aligned with the Common Core State Standards and the 21st-century skills framework.
Here are some examples you can use as a basis.
HOT in literature
In this example, the task is to summarize the plot of Harper Lee’s book To Kill a Mockingbird.
To work on HOTS, ask your students to analyze how Atticus Finch is a character who embodies the ethical dilemmas of 1930s America.
In addition, you can ask them to evaluate whether his approach could be used in a current racial discrimination lawsuit, using two real court cases in the US as evidence.
HOT in physical education
In this case, the task you can propose is to list the basic rules of basketball and design a team strategy for a game with players of different physical levels.
You can invite them to predict the possible risks of injury based on official NBA data.
HOT in social studies
You can ask your class to define supply and demand in economics class by analyzing President Donald Trump’s tariff policy.
To enhance HOTS, you can ask your students to design an alternative advertising campaign that balances corporate profits with access to products for low-income consumers.
HOT in geography
In geography, you can ask your students to identify the watersheds of the United States on a map and analyze how climate change has altered drought patterns in particularly vulnerable areas.
They can complete the activity by designing a water management plan for the next five years that balances agriculture, cities, and ecosystems.
HOT in biology
In biology, if you were to ask your students to memorize the life cycle of a butterfly (egg, caterpillar, pupa, and adult), you could motivate them with a practical experiment.
Invite them to analyze how the heat waves produced in 2025 in the monarch butterfly migration corridor affect the hatching of eggs. They can also design artificial shelters with native plants on ranches or school farms.
HOT in music
In this case, the starting task is to identify basic musical notes.
To work on higher-order thinking skills, ask your students how Kanye West’s hip-hop reflects racial tensions in the US.
Accompany the practice by asking them to create an original track that fuses jazz and trap to address issues relevant to society.
HOT in STEAM
In STEAM, you can ask your students to define what an algorithm is. Invite them to create an application focused on optimizing delivery routes in their city during snowfall, for example.
The challenge is to defend why the algorithm they create outperforms Google Maps and other similar applications when traffic is low, for example.
As you can see, creativity and innovation are essential skills for students and teachers alike, who must have the necessary training to design relevant activities that are aligned with educational objectives and motivate their students.
Questions that require higher-order thinking skills
The selection of questions will determine whether students will use higher-order thinking or, on the contrary, focus on mere information retrieval.
For example, if you ask, “Which gases contribute to the greenhouse effect?”, you are asking students to remember, but you are not activating their higher-order thinking.
To do this, in the same field, you could ask, “Can you evaluate the measures that claim that individual decisions can significantly reduce climate change?” With this last question, you are requiring your students to use systemic thinking and value judgments.
However, to maximize the effects of the practice, you must consider that students need time to activate HOTS, otherwise they will resort to quick and superficial answers. Analytical thinking takes time.
As a guideline, higher-order questions must have certain characteristics to be effective:
- They cannot be answered with a “yes” or “no.”
- They require evidence-based reasoning.
- They facilitate the connection of multiple concepts.
- They require weighing contradictory statements.
- They involve generating original solutions or ideas.
We saw this in the first activity we proposed as an example for a literature class.
Instead of asking students to summarize the book, which involves extracting information, they are asked to analyze Atticus Finch’s ethical dilemmas, relating them to current issues.
Metacognition and higher-order thinking
In higher-order thinking,metacognition is a crucial aspect. It consists of people’s ability to monitor and regulate their own cognitive processes, to reflect on them, and to evaluate and improve their own strategies.
One of the simplest yet most effective techniques is thinking aloud. Applied in the classroom, the teacher can verbalize their actual thought process while solving a problem in front of the class. It is important to include mistakes and corrections.
Through this process, students learn how to reflect on their own learning through structured reflection using feedback from the teacher.
For example, after modeling the process, the teacher asks students to apply the same modus operandi after completing a challenging task. They can guide the reflection with questions such as, “What strategy did you try first and why?” or “When did you realize that your initial approach was wrong?”
With this method, students will become accustomed to naturally reflecting on their knowledge acquisition process, self-correcting, and seeing their mistakes as an opportunity for improvement and refinement.
How to assess higher-order thinking skills
The assessment of higher-order thinking skills allows teaching to be aligned with academic objectives, capturing real reasoning and providing formative and summative feedback to improve cognitive learning.
This does not mean abandoning standardized tests that favor recall, but rather combining multiple-choice formats that appeal to LOTS with authentic assessments that stimulate HOTS.
This reveals knowledge, but also analytical and argumentative skills that are essential for workforce readiness.
Authentic assessment strategies
Authentic assessments include activities typical of active methodologies such as projects, portfolios, or peer reviews, and assessment tools such as analytical rubrics to measure specific criteria.
Depending on the activities you introduce in the classroom and how you approach them, you will require the activation of different levels of HOTS:
| Resources | Description | HOT level |
| Portfolio | Collection of evidence showing the student’s progress | Analyze, evaluate |
| Design project | Innovative solution to a real problem | Create, evaluate |
| Peer review | Structured assessment using shared rubrics | Assess |
| Project-based learning | In-depth group research culminating in a tangible product | All |
Analytical rubrics and criteria for evaluating HOTS
Analytical rubrics provide a practical and measurable framework for assessing higher-order thinking skills, as they allow complex tasks to be broken down into specific criteria.
This enables teachers to accurately identify and assess cognitive skills in students, such as creativity, problem-solving, and critical thinking.
Some indicators you can measure are:
- Evidence analysis. You can assess the ability to interpret information, select relevant and authoritative sources, and support conclusions with research findings.
- Originality. You can measure this through the degree of innovation of the proposed solutions or the products generated, depending on the practice.
- Complexity of synthesis. You can consider how the student integrates multiple concepts, sources of information, or theses to make coherent proposals.
- Clarity of argument. You can take into account criteria such as coherence, organization, and soundness of the reasoning presented.
Rubrics allow you to align assessment with the real needs of your proposals as a teacher and the performance of your students.
Another aspect to consider is the need for modern assessment to guarantee the academic integrity of tests in digital environments, but also in face-to-face environments that are developed with technological tools.
Proctoring plans such as those from Smowltech provide innovative, non-invasive solutions for supervising exams and tests tailored to the needs of each educational institution or project.
This way, you can ensure that assessment tasks requiring HOTs are carried out securely, fairly, and transparently thanks to features such as advanced computer monitoring, secure browser blocking, and user authentication.
In addition, SMOWL solutions facilitate the management of reports and objective evidence to support decision-making by teaching staff, especially in complex assessment processes.
We invite you to request a free demo, so we can explain exactly how we can improve your assessments and strengthen your students’ confidence in the process.
Essential resources for delving deeper into higher-order thinking
We have compiled some resources that can help you go further on the topic of the article:
- Center for Critical Thinking is the academic reference of highest authority in critical thinking.
- Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). An organization dedicated to educational leadership in curriculum development in the USA.
- National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). Professional resources for educators in mathematics and complex problem-solving.
- ISTE Standards: For Students. Collects technology standards with a focus on innovative design, computational thinking, and creative problem-solving.
