Assessment rubrics: definition and practical development

Assessment rubrics support a structured, objective, transparent, and fair qualitative evaluation of task or educational activity performance. 

This evaluative tool is truly useful for developing strategies focused on meaningful learning, as it allows for constructive and well-reasoned feedback so that students can engage in a continuous learning dynamic. 

Therefore, this type of assessment addresses challenges such as classroom diversity or reinforcing student engagement. In this article, we will delve into assessment rubrics and provide you with relevant information to help you learn how to create them.

What is rubrics in assessment?

Assessment rubrics, or scoring matrices, are structured tools that clearly describe the criteria and performance levels to be used to evaluate an educational activity, promoting a comprehensive educational model where feedback is of utmost importance. 

By incorporating them into educational strategies, both teachers and students can rely on a precise guide to the expectations of each task, encouraging processes that are more relevant, objective, fair, and oriented toward continuous improvement of the learning experience.

This evaluative resource is usually presented in table form, typically consisting of three parts:

• Aspects or criteria to evaluate.
• Descriptors that indicate how each aspect should be to achieve different levels of quality.
• Performance levels or rating scale.

In short, an assessment rubric is a list of criteria that is objective, transparent, and formative, allowing the evaluation of an educational activity with clear descriptions of how to assess each criterion and degrees of student mastery.

Functions of assessment rubrics

These tools allow for the precise establishment of the criteria to be evaluated in a practice, fulfilling strategic functions in teaching and learning, such as:

• Comprehensive and dynamic assessment of skills such as teamwork, disciplinary knowledge, or logical argumentation in a presentation thanks to its structured format.
• Transparency of the evaluation process from the beginning. Each participant understands how the work will be assessed, making the evaluation fairer.
• Incorporation of self-assessment with clear criteria that also facilitate quick feedback, allowing students to improve their academic results.

In this way, both teacher and student understand the level of achievement reached in each analyzed criterion, building a relationship of trust. You will better understand this through the different types of assessment rubrics.

Types of assessment rubrics and classroom examples

One of the main advantages of assessment rubrics is that they can be used in different formats to adapt to the needs of each task or activity. 

To give you an idea, we will present six types of assessment rubrics below, with examples and a final diagram of how each can be represented. Additionally, in the last section, you will find a comparative table with all these options.

Generic rubric

As the name implies, the generic rubric allows the evaluation of student performance in general aspects, making it truly versatile. It also facilitates consistency and comparison throughout students’ learning paths. 

For example, you can use it to assess oral presentations, considering criteria such as clarity in the presentation, coherence, body language, or use of language. As you can see, it can be applied to any subject or topic and allows you to provide effective and objective feedback.

Criterion	Excellent	Good	Fair	Insufficient
Clarity	Explanation with clear and coherent ideas.	Explains correctly, but with some mistakes.	Explains with difficulty.	Does not explain clearly.
Spelling	Impeccable.	Some spelling mistakes, but few.	Frequent errors.	Many serious errors.

Holistic or global rubric

The holistic rubric focuses on evaluating the student’s performance globally, rather than on specific criteria. It consists of assigning a single score that reflects the overall quality of the work based on different levels of achievement. 

In this rubric, each descriptor defines the level of achievement (it can be the degree of quality, content comprehension, or overall mastery of a subject), allowing the student to understand what each grade means and how to improve.

You can use this type of rubric to evaluate the overall outcome of an essay, assessing whether it provides original ideas and whether its writing is of quality.

Performance level	Performance description
Excellent	Complete work, with original ideas and clear, fluent writing.
Good	Clear, meets most requirements, although there is room for improvement.
Fair	Meets some requirements: contains errors, unclear or repetitive ideas, and lacks detail.
Insufficient	Incomplete, does not meet minimum requirements, and writing is poor.

Analytical rubric

The analytical rubric breaks a task into specific parts or criteria and evaluates them separately using a concrete performance scale. Each aspect receives an individual evaluation, which is then summed to obtain a total score. 

It is very useful in educational scaffolding strategies because it allows identifying strengths and areas for improvement in each domain, specifying which dynamics should be applied for the student to succeed and achieve better results.

This process also involves a metacognitive approach since, with analytical evaluations, teachers and students have objective data that help them reflect on the teaching-learning process. 

Using this tool, a school assignment can include criteria such as originality of the main idea, quality of supporting ideas, or other aspects like writing, spelling, etc. 

Additionally, tracking requested improvements can be incorporated, depending on what you need to analyze. Its great advantage is versatility and the depth of analysis you can establish based on your strategies.

Studies such as the one conducted by Florentino López, titled Validation of a rubric for teaching competencies in the framework of key learning, conclude that the analytical rubric is an effective instrument for assessing aspects like cognitive skills, pedagogical knowledge, or teaching strategies.

Criterion	Excellent	Very good	Good	Fair	Insufficient
Originality of the central idea.	Original and attractive idea.	Interesting idea with a novel approach.	Interesting idea, but not novel.	Idea not original or unclear.	Idea is not understood.
Writing and coherence.	Excellent.	Coherent and clearly explained.	Correct writing, but with errors.	Poor expression and lack of cohesion.	Writing full of errors and inaccuracies that make it hard to understand.
Requested corrections.	Performs all requested corrections.	Some corrections missing, but most applied.	Only some corrections applied.	Very few corrections made.	No corrections performed.

Weighted rubric

In a weighted assessment rubric, each criterion is evaluated separately according to performance levels and assigned a specific weight in the overall evaluation of the task, using an assigned percentage. To obtain the final result, the weighted scores are summed. 

This method is especially useful when some aspects of the assessment are more important or complex than others and need to be balanced.

For example, if you need to evaluate a project and assign different weights to the criteria:

• Content: 50%.
• Planning: 30%.
• Presentation: 20%.

When evaluating performance, you might set 4 levels: excellent (3 points), good (2 points), fair (1 point), insufficient (0 points). In a scenario where a student scores: 3 points in content, 2 in planning, and 3 in presentation, the result would be:

• Content: 50% / 10 × 3 = 15 points.
• Planning: 30% / 10 × 2 = 6 points.
• Presentation: 20% / 10 × 3 = 6 points.

If summed, the student’s total score would be 27 points.

Criterion	Weight (%)	Insufficient (0 points)	Fair (1 point)	Good (2 points)	Excellent (3 points)
Content	50	Poor and disconnected.	Not sufficient.	Adequate and clear.	Complete and relevant.
Planning	30	Does not exist.	Basic.	Adequate, meets project needs.	Detailed, clear, and pertinent.
Presentation	20	Disorganized and careless.	Unclear.	Adequate.	Very well-prepared.

Single-point rubric

The single-point rubric defines only one performance level for each criterion. Its purpose is to indicate whether the established standard is met or not. This assessment includes personalized feedback on what stands out and what can be improved. 

It is a type of scoring matrix that helps promote self-assessment (students evaluate their own work) or peer assessment (evaluation by classmates).

Criterion	Needs improvement	Expected level	Exceeds standard
Organization	Lacks coherence.	Clear structure and submitted on time.	Adds examples, good coherence.
Oral expression	Confusing language and occasionally unintelligible.	Expresses clearly.	Expresses with enthusiasm and enriches speech with examples.
Vocabulary usage	Inappropriate and/or limited vocabulary.	Uses an appropriate lexical field for the topic.	Uses precise and varied vocabulary.

For a practical and validated example of using a single-point rubric, refer to the study by Miguel Somoano in the course “Machine Elements” of the Mechanical Engineering Degree at the University of Oviedo. 

This peer-assessment tool for final group project presentations helped encourage active student participation.

Specific rubric

In a specific rubric, the criteria focus on very particular characteristics related to concepts, skills, and abilities inherent to the task being evaluated. It allows for great precision and effective feedback for the student. In other words, it is a custom-made tool.

For example, to analyze a scientific project in the classroom, you can establish a four-level score (excellent, good, fair, or insufficient) for criteria such as content mastery, practical application, technical accuracy, argumentation and justification, and creativity and originality.

Comparative table of rubric types

The table below summarizes different types of assessment rubrics with some essential characteristics, helping you quickly identify which might fit your evaluative needs. 

Remember, the key to success is adaptation; beyond the provided information, you should thoroughly evaluate which rubric type is best in each case.

Rubric type	Definition	Key advantage	Application
Generic	Uses general criteria for similar tasks.	Very versatile and reusable.	Suitable for analyzing transversal competencies and activities of different nature.
Holistic	Analyzes overall performance using a single score.	Provides a quick and simple evaluation method.	Useful for simple tasks or global evaluations.
Analytical	Each criterion is scored separately.	Offers detailed feedback.	Works well in complex and multidimensional activities.
Weighted	Evaluates criteria according to their importance.	Balances and adjusts the impact of each criterion.	Good choice when aspects have varying importance.
Single-point (Hashem)	Does not use graduated descriptions. Teacher indicates whether the standard is met and provides constructive criticism.	Provides clarity to students, focusing on learning.	Useful in formative assessments and continuous improvement.
Specific	Evaluation criteria are tailored to each task.	Offers high precision.	Applicable to unique facts, products, or procedures.

How to make rubrics for assessments, step-by-step guide

Much of the success of your assessment rubrics lies in proper initial planning. For this reason, we want to share 8 essential steps to help you create effective and innovative assessment rubrics.

Define learning objectives

Objectives should be clear, coherent, specific, and aligned with the curriculum. Ask yourself: what skills, competencies, and/or knowledge will you assess in students?

Tip: Base them on SMART objectives (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) and involve students so they understand and engage in achieving them.

Identify the criteria you will assess

Once objectives are established, identify the criteria. They should be directly related to the objectives and reflect what is expected from students in a given task.

Tip: Prioritize the most relevant criteria and communicate their importance to students.

Establish performance levels

The third step is to choose a scale for evaluating competencies for each criterion. These can be descriptive (excellent, good, fair, insufficient) or numerical (e.g., levels 0 to 5).

Tip: Keep the number of levels manageable; for example, work with 3 to 5 levels.

---

---

Write descriptors for each level

Each criterion should have a precise and concrete description for each level. The goal is for students to understand the expectations of the task, so descriptors should define specific evidence and behaviors.

Tip: Start by writing the highest and lowest levels first, which makes it easier to define intermediate levels and ensures a logical progression.

Assign weight to each criterion (optional)

This is seen in weighted rubrics. If some criteria are more relevant than others, you can assign a specific percentage weight in relation to the final score to balance the results.

Tip: Clearly explain the distribution of importance across criteria.

Test the rubric

It is very important to test your rubric. You can evaluate it with sample work or compare it with colleagues. The goal is to verify that it is clear, fair, and can be successfully applied. Make adjustments if necessary.

Tip: Request feedback on platforms where the teaching community participates, and use this information to improve accessibility, functionality, and design.

Share the assessment matrix with students

Before using your assessment matrix, present it to students. Knowing the criteria and performance levels before the evaluation builds trust and supports autonomous learning.

Tip: You can run a mock assessment before the final test, allowing students to ask questions.

Provide constructive feedback

Detailed feedback allows you to highlight strengths and identify areas for improvement to help students grow.

Tip: Ensure students understand the feedback and encourage them to apply critical thinking in self-assessment or peer assessment.

Tips and recommendations for better results

To achieve the best results, consider these additional recommendations:

• Write criteria in a positive tone, e.g., labels like expert level, competent, in progress, or beginner.
• Reinforce what students do well and don’t focus solely on mistakes.
• Invite students to participate in creating rubrics, including defining criteria and levels, to strengthen engagement and self-assessment.
• Incorporate interactive digital tools so students can self-assess and peer-assess online, obtaining immediate feedback. Multimedia supports make rubrics more accessible, visual, and motivating.

With this small guide, you can create more efficient, fair, and meaningful assessment rubrics that motivate learning for all.

What elements should an assessment rubric include? Necessary parts

Every rubric should include three basic elements:

1. Evaluation criteria or indicators: Aspects aligned with assessment objectives. Example: evaluating essay writing.
2. Scores or performance levels for each criterion: Conceptual or numerical, should be relevant, objective, and aligned with the criteria. Example: Excellent, very good, fair, insufficient.
3. Score descriptors: Detailed explanations for each level. Example: for “Excellent” in essay writing, proper syntax, cohesion, and content coherence are expected.

Examples of assessment rubrics for active learning methodologies in the classroom 

When developing assessment rubrics, you can use Open Educational Resources (OERs), which are copyright-free materials you can use, modify, and share freely.

Digital tools for creating rubrics

Digital tools for creating assessment rubrics allow you to save time, innovate, improve accessibility, and support formative feedback.

Additionally, they are an engaging way to encourage active student participation, empowering learners through the development of a critical approach to their own learning process.

Similarly, digitizing assessment matrices helps reduce evaluation biases. In any case, these tools contribute to more effective, transparent, and adaptable assessments. Most of these resources can typically be integrated into Learning Management Systems (LMS).

To help you start exploring the many possibilities offered by information and communication technologies (ICT), below we share some of the most commonly used resources by the educational community that you can incorporate into your classes:

• RubiStar: This is a simple tool that allows you to create rubrics in just a few minutes. It may be somewhat basic visually, but it is efficient and functional.
• Additio: This is a comprehensive classroom management app. It includes a dedicated section to create fully customizable rubrics with weighting and competency alignment.
• Rubric Maker: This tool allows you to create rubrics intuitively, integrating artificial intelligence, and export them in multiple formats.
• CoRubric: The interesting feature of this platform is its collaborative nature, allowing you to evaluate your rubrics with feedback from education professionals.
• Google Forms: Although primarily a tool for surveys and form creation, it can also be used to create interactive rubrics with real-time analysis.

Assessment rubrics and proctoring: enhancing test integrity

Proctoring or remote monitoring of exams can enhance rubric results when quality and relevance criteria are met. Professional proctoring plans developed by Smowltech allow you to:

• Ensure the integrity of the entire process
• Complement formative assessment
• Provide objective data and detailed reports
• Improve teacher and student confidence
• Enable virtual evaluation with standards equivalent to in-person supervision
• Ensure compliance with privacy and data security regulations

To learn how we can enhance your evaluations, request a free demo to explore tailored solutions.

Assessment rubrics and AI

Artificial intelligence is a highly valuable resource for generating personalized and detailed rubrics in just a few minutes, tailored to a specific curricular context. However, it is a tool, so you must provide the information, procedure, and description of your needs accurately and in detail.

If your base work is of high quality, the results will meet your expectations. When used correctly, AI can transform the assessment process into a more agile and meaningful experience.

The importance of feedback in assessment rubrics

Feedback in assessment rubrics has gained significant importance under the educational regulatory changes introduced, for example, by the LOMLOE, the current reform in Spain, as it emphasizes meaningful and competency-based learning.

Accordingly, this law promotes evaluation not only of knowledge but also the integrated application of key competencies in real and complex situations.

This approach also encourages cooperative learning, in alignment with Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4) of the 2030 Agenda, which advocates for an education where students acquire life skills and competencies.

Benefits of assessment rubrics for teachers, institutions, and students

As a conclusion, we have compiled the most significant benefits of assessment rubrics in a concise table, which will provide valuable information:

Beneficiary group	Added value and impact
Teachers	Optimizes teaching management by enabling clear and fair assessments.Facilitates customization of tests according to curriculum needs.Reduces biases and improves the justification of evaluations.Supports formative and comprehensive assessments.
Institutions	Helps unify criteria across different educational stages.Improves monitoring and justification of results.Promotes a culture of quality and innovation in evaluations.Enhances the competitiveness of educational institutions.
Students	Empowers students, guiding them toward autonomous learning.Promotes critical thinking development and continuous improvement.Helps build a climate of trust and motivation.Supports planning strategies to overcome obstacles and difficulties, fostering more inclusive classrooms and more accessible learning.

Despite all these benefits, it is also necessary to highlight the challenges posed by this type of assessment, such as the time required for planning, designing, and implementing them. Another challenge is teacher training focused on acquiring or improving skills in clear language, digitalization, and constructive communication.

In this same vein, teachers should avoid oversimplifying evaluations, instead working on enriching feedback processes and always prioritizing a formative approach. The ultimate goal, as mentioned earlier, is to foster meaningful learning that is, consequently, lasting and stable.

Deepen your understanding of assessment rubrics

The resource we propose below will allow you to explore further the topic covered in this article:

• RCampus iRubric. A free digital platform to create, share, and use assessment rubrics, featuring an extensive library of matrices created by educators from around the world.