Top-down approach: advantages and disadvantages

Top-down approach is a strategy whereby decisions, from vision to assignments, are made by highest members of the hierarchy.

In this article we are going to talk not only about what is the Top-down approach, but also about the advantages and disadvantages of implementing it in your projects, teams or company.

What is the Top-down approach?

The Top-down approach is a strategy whereby decisions are made at the highest level of the corporate hierarchy and then reported to the rest of the team members. It is also known as autocratic leadership.

When applied in a customized way according to needs, it is a leadership style that can be adopted at different levels of projects but also in teams and even in the entire company.

The process of the Top-down approach follows the following phases:

1. The planning process is designed by management with a broad or general description of the project, problem or system.
2. An action plan is created by defining and breaking down by levels the tasks or components of the process to be carried out.
3. Decision makers communicate it to the team based on the key priorities and strategic alignments of the work group(s).
4. The team implements it taking into account the objectives set or the general policies that affect each level of the process.

5 Top-down approach advantages

The Top-down approach advantages are many and we detail them below.

A known management style

The fact that the Top-down approach is known means that it eliminates confusion because it is always the same from one project to another.

In addition, it can be a learning process for new employees if they come from another company that uses this methodology.

Process clarity and better communication

On the one hand, the fact that decisions are made from a single profile helps communication to be fluid and in a single direction.

On the other hand, this management style is based on clear and well-organized processes, helping to make their development and training quick and easy for employees to grasp.

Both of these benefits help to reduce the risk and likelihood of confusion and misunderstandings or at least less frequently than in other management styles.

The flow of information between the different levels of the company ensures that all messages and strategies reach the end of the chain.

Keeping the organization of initiatives clear in large teams is key to the success of your projects.

---

---

Better follow-up in case of inefficiencies

Detecting, diagnosing and proposing corrective measures in case of inefficiencies is easier, since you start from a single decision point and with perfectly established teams.

Faster implementation of decisions

Again, decision making from a single level of management allows the whole process to be more agile than if it had to be agreed upon by several leaders or members of each project.

Better resource planning

The Top-down approach helps to optimize resource planning and allocation, paying special attention to the most critical aspects of the project.

Depending on the needs, resources will be distributed accordingly.

4 Top-down disadvantages

As well as having advantages, the Top-down approach also involves a series of disadvantages. Among the main ones are those detailed below.

Limits to creativity

Limits to creativity arise because employees are isolated in their responsibilities and cannot contribute their knowledge or ideas to the company’s overall objectives or to the development of new or existing projects.

The lack of opportunity to provide feedback at workplace sometimes leads to frustration and lack of motivation on the part of employees.

Dictatorial system

Centralizing decisions at the management level and not allowing the participation of all members of the organization can sometimes be interpreted as an oppressive and imposed system.

Employees may feel this micromanagement system as a lack of confidence in their talent, initiative or experience making the pressure on them stifling and unnecessary.

One way to alleviate this problem would be to implement a talent strategy that restores employee confidence.

Slow down problem solving 

The solution to problems has to come from top management and this sometimes slows down decision making, which otherwise could have been taken more quickly because there is a greater number of people in charge with the capacity to do so.

This is a clear symptom of this type of management’s lower flexibility and responsiveness.

Risk of isolation

Senior managers do not participate in the development of the daily realities of the company, but are limited to making the initial decision that will be followed later in the corresponding process.

This results in a high risk that the managing directors are distanced from these realities and, therefore, in a higher probability of making decisions that are not 100 % in line with the reality of the company or the project.

On the other hand, the trust and connection of the rest of the employees with the management team will be lower or null, reinforcing the lack of communication between both parties.

In many companies, the existence of critical roles and competent employees makes it easier to make the right decisions and solve unexpected problems.

At Smowltech we are committed to the development of technology that not only ensures safe environments in your company and for your employees, but also helps them develop their potential and skills. To this end, we have designed a series of proctoring plans with customized solutions for your projects.

If you want to know more about our software, do not hesitate to request a free demo in which we will show you how we can help you.

---

---